Re: Xen support in Lenny?
- To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Xen support in Lenny?
- From: Paul van der Vlis <paul@vandervlis.nl>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:42:00 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 488F3A48.7070307@vandervlis.nl>
- In-reply-to: <488ED98E.4000607@debian.org>
- References: <4885A0A4.4010401@vandervlis.nl> <488E201C.7010201@gmx.de> <200807290050.48095.debian@layer-acht.org> <20080728230459.GR24453@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <488ED98E.4000607@debian.org>
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schreef:
> Hi!
>
> Michael Banck schrieb:
>
> [ XEN status for Lenny ]
>
>> A paragraph in the next DPN discussing the relevant mailing list thread
>> looks in order to me though, anyway.
>
> I agree, that this would warrant a paragraph in the next DPN. However
> my knowledge about XEN is quite limited, so I would prefer someone else
> to write something up. Any volunteers for that?
My english is not very well, but I will try:
-------------
Lenny with limited Xen support
Lenny will have limited Xen support because the vanilla-kernel has only
32-bits domU (guest) support with PAE, and no dom0 (host) support. The
dom0 in Etch does not support PAE.
Pasi Kärkkäinen explained the situation [1] and Bastian Blank wrote an
article [2] about the options we have. His conclusion is to support an
2.6.18 kernel in Lenny, until Lenny+1/2 adds better Xen support.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/07/msg00475.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/07/msg00476.html
-----------
Realize that the article of Bastian gives only options, the conclusion
is his conclusion. Will this confuse people?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
http://www.vandervlis.nl/
Reply to: