Re: DNS: MX and CNAME records

[Cole Tuininga <colet@code-energy.com>]

On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 20:09 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> my understanding of CNAME records is that an MX may not be a CNAME
> record, 

My understanding of the RFC's is that if you have a CNAME for a given
hostname, technically *no* other record types are legal.

-- 
A: Yes.                                                               
> Q: Are you sure?                                                    
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.           
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

Cole Tuininga
colet@code-energy.com
http://www.code-energy.com/