Re: DNS: MX and CNAME records
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 20:09 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> my understanding of CNAME records is that an MX may not be a CNAME
My understanding of the RFC's is that if you have a CNAME for a given
hostname, technically *no* other record types are legal.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?