Re: Webserver Redundacy
Quoting "Wojciech Ziniewicz" <wojciech.ziniewicz@gmail.com>:
> If you've got funds
How many do!? :)
> storage server (keeping the maildirs) with fiber channel interfaces so
> two servers would share the same storage (via global filesystem - GFS
> ) so there would be no "locking issues" even if you use mailbox format
> etc..
> between theese two MX servers and internet i woudl use a simple
> loadbalancer utilizing your favourite failover protocol (maybe stp on
> you switches etc etc etc... )
They you STILL get single-point-of failure... On hardware that costs
a fortune! Better to have that problem with stuff you can easily
replace...
--
$400 million in gold bullion Khaddafi NSA jihad radar ammonium PLO
Clinton class struggle terrorist Mossad congress supercomputer FBI
SEAL Team 6
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
[Or http://www.europarl.eu.int/tempcom/echelon/pdf/rapport_echelon_en.pdf]
If neither of these works, try http://www.aclu.org and search for echelon.
Note. This is a real, not fiction.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/09/06/eu_releases_echelon_spying_report/
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/23989res20060131.html#echelon
Reply to: