Re: Spamassassin & Investor Spam
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:24:09PM +0800, GPLHost (thomas) wrote:
> > I think that Debian should switch from using Mailman to MLMMJ which is
> > a lot more powerful.
On 11.09.06 16:02, Craig Sanders wrote:
> it's not the list admin software that's at fault. it's the fact that
> very little work is done on maintaining anti-spam rules on debian's
> mail servers.
You can report spam via buttons in the lists archives for a long time, and
via bouncing spam to special address for a few months.
> > With it comes moderation and "subonlypost" function
> mailman does that too. the debian list administrators have chosen to
> make the list open for posting by anyone. whether this is a good idea or
> not is debatable - there are good arguments both for and against.
afaik it was a wide consensus that it's good idea to keep lists open for
non-subscribers.
I've already seen case where user subscribed to list to send spam to it...
This could happen in debian lists very fast.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
It's now safe to throw off your computer.
Reply to: