[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: More sorbs blacklisting



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 31/07/2006, at 6:46 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:

Am 2006-06-07 09:03:12, schrieb Andy Smith:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:10:16AM -0700, Steve Redlich wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Kurt Petersen wrote:
My DSL IP address has the following line at arin.net:

Comment:    ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE

You understand this is to do with whether the IP allocation is
Provider Aggregatable (PA) or Provider Independent (PI), and not
anything to do with dynamic or static leases, right?

See http://www.ripn.net:8082/nic/ripe-docs/ripe-127.txt

Right, but in most cases, the NON-PORTABLE IP-Addresses
are Dynamic.  (maybe over 99%)

Hi Michelle,

"In most cases"? That is like saying that most of the IP addresses in the Internet are dynamic. I personally do not know if this is or isn't the case.

The entry in the RIPE Database regarding NON-PORTABLE are to tell your customers that NO, they can't have these IP addresses when they change service providers - They are NOT Portable. These numbers are assigned to a provider - and they stay with that provider. I don't know if RIPE even still issues Provider Independent addresses....

Regards

Andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFE3LSfW126qUNSzvURAo/eAJ9jpXrhAyZQJ9XcIccBQXgRItQeVACgktR8
JXcut/Ke/YhYt9/ycz55Rrs=
=BLbY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: