RE: SPF was Re: never use sorbs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Gran [mailto:sgran@debian.org]
> Sent: 28 July 2006 01:10
> To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: SPF was Re: never use sorbs
>
> This one time, at band camp, Paul Johnson said:
> > On Thursday 27 July 2006 09:23, Michael Loftis wrote:
> >
> > > forwarders also don't work
> >
> > They do if you implement SRS like you're supposed to if you're running a
> > forwarder.
>
> Is there a functional SRS out there? I had thought it was pretty much a
> dead end, since you can either decide not to forward DSN's back to the
> original sender, or risk being an open relay. Both of those count as
> non-functional options in my book.
I really fail to see the problem with the forwards. Surly a host can be
configured to turn a blind eye to backup mail servers and the likes. Since
the backup should verify the SPF records. What's the requirement for the SRS
forwarder ? Or if a lot of mail is coming from a forwarders why should it
not be added to the SPF record ?
Reply to: