Re: Spamassassin & Investor Spam
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:35:31AM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> At 12:42 PM 9/11/2006 +0100, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> >Presumably you don't actually mean "irregardless" - which would mean
> >"with regard" - but rather "regardless"?
> >
> >Or am I being too picky?
>
> Or not picky enough. "Irregardless" is not a word, period. :)
and those who use it have a special place reserved for them in hell -
right next to the place for those who write "alot" rather than "a lot".
craig
--
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au> (part time cyborg)
Reply to: