[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: More sorbs blacklisting



Am 2006-06-07 09:03:12, schrieb Andy Smith:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:10:16AM -0700, Steve Redlich wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Kurt Petersen wrote:
> > My DSL IP address has the following line at arin.net:
> > 
> > Comment:    ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
> 
> You understand this is to do with whether the IP allocation is
> Provider Aggregatable (PA) or Provider Independent (PI), and not
> anything to do with dynamic or static leases, right?
> 
> See http://www.ripn.net:8082/nic/ripe-docs/ripe-127.txt

Right, but in most cases, the NON-PORTABLE IP-Addresses
are Dynamic.  (maybe over 99%)

I now own 16 /24 blocks where 15 blocks are dynamic...

Greetings
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSM LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)



Reply to: