Re: More sorbs blacklisting
On Monday 07 August 2006 17:54, Craig Sanders wrote:
> trouble is that whoever you spoke to is not actually clued up, they are
> speaking complete shit.
> did you ever stop to think that your ISP is either lying to cover their
> laziness and incompetence or just speaking shit because they don't have a
> fucking clue?
What an interesting idea.
> if SORBS are listing it as dynamic it is because your ISP is too lazy
> and/or clueless to properly register their networks blocks with ARIN.
Would SORBS be hallucinating that registration of dynamic
netblocks is covered in RFC2050 do you think?
Or would SORBS instead be imagining that there is a field
to specify a netblock as dynamic when requesting an
Perhaps the non-existent dynamic flag in SWIP?
> there you have it - comments from a clueless ISP drone speaking shit to
> cover their arse being used by a clueless end-user to "support" their
> baseless whinge about the SORBS DUL.
> no, you just wanted to continue your boring fucking whinge. give it a
> fucking rest, we're all sick and tired of it.
Thank you so much for sharing. (Plonk)