[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RES: RES: RES: RES: DHCP Server



Only the machine it's ok for me.
I knew that customers can to hide their identity.
The question is: If I haven't any registers, the ISP is incriminated here.

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Dan MacNeil [mailto:dan@thecsl.org] 
Enviada em: sábado, 13 de maio de 2006 23:24
Para: Reinaldo U. Santos Jr
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: DHCP Server

Reinaldo U. Santos Jr wrote:
> My goal is to track some cybercrime on my clients.
> I have an IP valid, and I assign ip no-valid for they.
 > If they did some cybercrime, I need to know.

If  67.18.3.194 did a crime, you want to know for sure that it was Jim 
Jones and not John Smith?

When you cut Jim Jones off, you want to be sure that he is the guilty one?

You can assume that your criminal customers will try to hid their identity?


> 
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Dan MacNeil [mailto:dan@thecsl.org] 
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 12 de maio de 2006 21:55
> Para: Reinaldo U. Santos Jr
> Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: DHCP Server
> 
> 
> Actually w/ sarge it seems to be:
> 
> 	/var/lib/dhcp3/dhcpd.leases
> 
> 
> ..This file contains info about what MAC address an IP address was 
> assigned to.
> 
> If your goal is to assign specific ip addresses to specific MAC 
> addresses, then a peek at:
> 
> 	man dhcd.conf
> 
> ...might be in order.
> 
> #########
> Reinaldo U. Santos Jr wrote:
> 
>>Great!!!
>>Now I need store in database. 
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>-----Mensagem original-----
>>De: Roberto C. Sanchez [mailto:roberto@familiasanchez.net] 
>>Enviada em: sexta-feira, 12 de maio de 2006 20:43
>>Para: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
>>Assunto: Re: RES: DHCP Server
>>
>>Reinaldo U. Santos Jr wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I need to know which ip was delivered to each client (desktop) by my DHCP
>>>Server.
>>>
>>>Is it possible?
>>>
>>
>>
>>All the information you need is in /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases
>>
>>-Roberto
>>
> 
> 
> 







Reply to: