Re: Downgrading to Apache 1.3
Right after making this post, I sent an e-mail to the webmin someone
(whatever e-mail is on the contact page) offering to use my perl
skills, my knowledge (limited) of the Apache2 configuration, some
cash, or a combination thereof to get this working. Don't assume.
Rod
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 03:18:48 +0000, W.D.McKinney wrote in message
> <[🔎] W6467313289132971129864728@burger.akwireless.net>:
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> > From: R. W. Rodolico [mailto:stargazer@rodolico.org]
>> > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 06:00 PM
>> > To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
>> > Subject: Downgrading to Apache 1.3
>> >
>> > I may need to downgrade to Apache 1.3 to fully utilize a package
>> I
>> > want to use that does not support the way Debian has Apache2 set
>> up
>> > (virtualmin/webmin). I can use the package, but will just not be
>> > able to delegate creation of new sites to someone else without
>> doing
>> > some training.
>> >
>> > Any arguments for/against. I don't see that I lose a lot by
>> going
>> > backwards here, but I may just be missing the point completely.
>> >
>> > Rod
>> >
>> >
>>
>> We run Apache 1.3 instead of Apache2 for those reasons also.
>
> ..if you guys pay people salaries to admin viable commercial web
> hosting, you can also afford to invest in getting virtualmin/webmin
> updated for Apache2. ;o)
>
> --
> ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
> ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
> Scenarios always come in sets of three:
> best case, worst case, and just in case.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
Meddle not in the Affairs of Dragons
for thou art crunchy, and good with catsup.
Reply to: