Re: new suid-perl debian security update breaks qmail-scanner!
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 20:21 +0200, Patrick Donker wrote:
> I was a bit quick sending 'thanks' :)
> What I wanted to ask also is, do you recommend simscan over QS?
Most definately. It is faster and much nicer on resources than QS was,
though QS certainly did a great job, Simscan just does it more
efficiently being written in C.
> read about it but dont know which is better....The box I am running my
> stuff on isnt very exciting either; P3 886 with 300something megs of
> ram. Yes I know, more mem should be put in, but that's something I had
> planned doing later...
Quick, hire a teenager while they still know everything. --Anonymous