Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
- To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
- From: Blu <blu@daga.cl>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:15:52 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040702111552.GJ1119@daga.cl>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20040630085340.A17642@ns.telnet.sk>
- References: <20040618142958.GA19680@let.rug.nl> <242C7FE4-C4EC-11D8-9CD4-000393758B2E@2sheds.de> <20040623082332.GG8199@daga.cl> <200406232101.24911.russell@coker.com.au> <20040623233352.GB20242@daga.cl> <20040630085340.A17642@ns.telnet.sk>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 08:53:40AM +0200, Matej Kovac wrote:
> > :) Well, my approach is not that fancy. I just check if the callback
> > passes the RCPT, and if not, issue a 550 with a short message telling
> > that my host will not accept mail that cannot be answered.
>
> you are receiving a message and you start callback to the mx if he passes
> the rcpt test, but - the mx starts callback to you if you pass...
[...]
Actually that's not the case. The callback is done with MAIL FROM:<>
Blu.
Reply to: