RE: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found
Arnd,
I don't know if it would work or not, but id be looking at running it in
a chroot jail or possibly even UML. This way it would only require the
libs it needs and the rest of the system should be fairly stable and it
will make it easy to upgrade the package at a later date or the
libs/prerequiste's of the package as they wont affect any other service
/ lib /system.
** Please correct me if Im wrong.
Regards,
Daniel Hooper
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnd Vehling [mailto:av@nethead.de]
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 2:36 PM
To: Debian ISP
Subject: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found
Hi,
ok, this is somewhat OT but anyway..
I have a binary (payware, no source) i need to run which needs bleeding
edge libs which are only available in debian testing. As the prog needs
to run on a production system i dont want to upgrade to the testing
distribution.
The libs in question are: libc.so.6 + libstdc++.so.5
I grabbed those, and some more libs from the unstable
distribution, installed (or extracted) them in a separate
dir tree but when i (LD_LIB_PATH set correctly) start the
prog i only get the following error message:
lib/ld-linux.so.2: version `GLIBC_PRIVATE' not found (required by
/usr/local/lib/libdl.so.2)
And some more similiar messages.
Can anyone clue me in on how to get those two forsaken libs cleanly
installed on a debian stable system so this damn binary will run?
thanx,
Arnd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: