Re: Mailscanner vs. amavis vs. other
Fraser Campbell wrote:
Hi,
We've had some experience with amavis over the last few years and while it
generally works it has an a tendency to lose the occassional message or just
continually requeue messages until their queue time expires and the message
bounces. We're using amavisd-postfix.
I know there are also other variants of amavis such as amavis-ng that we could
try. Has anyone compared amavis to mailscanner and come to a definite
conclusion as to one being better. I know better is very subjective but I'd
still like to hear opinions.
I'd like to eventually hook spam trapping into the filter (I think amavis-ng
does that) as well.
Thanks!
We're using amavisd-new (in an LVS cluster), with clamav. It works
fairly well, integrates spamassassin, and is able to fetch per user/per
domain prefs from an LDAP or SQL DB. But it's kind of a resource hog, as
every process eats about 20-25 MB after running a while. But I've yet to
stumble into a better solution.
Thomas
Reply to: