Re: New BIND 4 & 8 Vulnerabilities
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Craig Sanders wrote:
> FYI, doesn't look like the memory leaks have been fixed:
>
> # ps v -Cnamed
> PID TTY STAT TIME MAJFL TRS DRS RSS %MEM COMMAND
> 6799 ? S 0:00 111 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
> 6801 ? S 0:00 0 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
> 6802 ? S 466:10 2757 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
> 6803 ? S 0:04 1 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
> 6804 ? R 49:56 1 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
>
>
> this is on a machine where bind 8 used to use about 150MB. bind 9 has been
> running for only 4 days.
What did that "ps v -Cnamed" show on the earlier and later days?
Jeremy C. Reed
...................................................
BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
Reply to: