Re: pppd+radius ?
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> I've already started work on CHAP using libradius1, which is also what the
> PPP CVS code uses.
> I am going to eat the code that's in the PPP CVS. When I have every feature
> of that code and more I may put Portslave in the PPP CVS. I think we only
> need one PPP/RADIUS solution, I've spent the last two years hunting down
> other options and incorporating all their features...
But why not take the approach of taking all the current RADIUS
stuff out of portslave and going with PPP CVS then? Or are you
worried the PPP people aren't going to maintain their RADIUS plugin
properly? I mean, if you both use libradius1...
Portslave could then become a pure 'multiport-getty', i.e. everything a
NAS does before running PPP, or another service/line discipline, as an
external program. Why not?
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | email@example.com
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com