Re: [Fwd: Re: Spamassasin over RBL, was Re: rblsmtpd -t?]
> > no, it's not relative. there is an absolute, black-and-white criteria
> > which you are too stupid to see: if a site is part of the spam
> > then it should be black-listed. if it is not part of the problem then
> > it shouldn't be listed.
> Pray tell then, *when* is a site part of the spam problem?
> Please share your infallible, absolute, black-and-white criteria for
> that, because obviously we were missing it all along.
And if he can answer that, we've solved the spam problem altogether!
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org