Re: [HELP] RAID chunk-size - alternatives
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:29, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > Chunk size does not matter for RAID-1, but does matter for other RAID
> > levels.
> humm ..thought was the otehr way ... time for me to go look at some
> raid source code i suppose .. when time permits
The chunk size determines physical location of the data for RAID-0 and RAID-5.
For RAID-1 both disks will have exactly the same data, which is the same as
what you would have if you only had one disk. So chunk size is not an issue.
> > > if your disk was partitioned as... 2K bytes/inode...
> > You probably mean 2K blocks. The number of bytes per inode just
> > determines the size of the inode tables.
> yuppers ... and a block is 512bytes ( aka a sector )
No. A block is the allocation unit for the file system. For ext2 that can
be 1, 2, or 4K (but generally no-one uses 2K). For ReiserFS it's always 4K.
Other file systems have different options.
> > If you have lots of little files then if you want good write performance
> > then you want RAID-1 or RAID-10. RAID-5 is the cheap alternative.
> hummm ..... thinking outloud....
> "cheap" is relative???
> - $$$ for disks vs "(usable) disk space lost to raid"
Cheap is when you cut corners to save money.
> typically a minimum of 2 disks used for raid0 or raid1...
> raid1(mirroring) protects against one disk failure
> ( one disk's capacity is used as a redundant copy and not for user)
> ( 50% lost of space )
> raid0(stripping) does not help for disk failures
Yes. Also RAID-0 increases the probability of data loss unless you take
other protective measures. If during a particular time period the
probability of one disk failing is 0.1, then the probability of a RAID-0
failing is 1-(1-0.1)*(1-0.1) = 0.19.
> typically 5 disks for raid5 ...
> ( 3 disks mininum -- 1/3 of your disks lost to parity
> ( 4 disks .......... 1/4 of your disks lost to parity
> ( 5 disks .......... 1/5 of your disks lost to parity
Another thing, you should have a separate cable for each disk you want to be
independant. So for RAID-1 you should have two cables so that a cable
failure won't lose your data. For a RAID-5 with 5 disks you want 5 cables.
One setup I've seen had 30 disks with 5 RAID-5 arrays. There were 6 cables,
each RAID-5 array had 5 data disks and one spare disk on separate cables.
If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines
of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do
whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by
posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com