[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Apache with htpasswd without htaccess



Hi Piotr,

Sorry my reply wasn't exact either.
I should read you email more closely - sorry.
Looks like you may need a web scripting language like php, coldfuison, perl
etc, etc.
This way you can build a database and user GUI admin.
It's alot more involved than setting directives though.
Hope this helps
Rudi.




----- Original Message -----
From: "Piotr Roszatycki" <Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl>
To: "Rudi" <rudi@oasis.net.au>
Cc: <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: Apache with htpasswd without htaccess


> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Rudi wrote:
> > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/howto/auth.html
> >
> > <Directory /home/www/WWNames/Site_Files/wwnamesadmin>
> >     AuthType Basic
> >     AuthName "WWNames Authentication"
> >    AuthUserFile /home/realm/wwnames
>
> With this schema I have to modify httpd.conf all the time if any user want
> to lock or unlock his directory. This is annoying.
>
> On the other side, editing of .htaccess is too complicated for common user
> without knowledge of configurating webservers. Also, he must to know full
> path to his .htpasswd (with directory) even if he uploades his
> documents by chrooted FTP server. It could be problematic if the user's
> directory is made with some kind of hashing and his .htpasswd is in the
> nested subdirectory (i.e. /home/u/s/e/r/user/htdocs/data/doc/secret).
> Unfortunately, AuthUserFile seeks the file in ServerRoot, not in current
> directory.
>
> Sorry, my first mail wasn't precise.
>
> --
> Piotr Roszatycki, Netia Telekom S.A.                    .''`.
> mailto:Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl                   : :' :
> mailto:dexter@debian.org                               `. `'
>                                                          `-
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: