Re: mta confusion
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Noel Koethe wrote:
> > Whatever, if you stick with sendmail, I'll be happy to help - and in
> > this case, going to at least testing buys you *ALOT* with sendmail -
> > better SPAM protection, better performance, etc.
>
> Can you tell me, why sendmail has better spam protection and performance
> compared to exim, qmail and postfix?
> qmail and postfix can use the orb*.org Systems to block open relays and
> I know from postfix it can filter header and body from a message for
> what ever you like.
Ditto on both for sendmail...
> I'm only interested in the reasonwhy you write "better". Its not my
> goal to start a "holy war".
Reread that again please. My statement was comparing the testing/unstable
version of sendmail (8.12.1) against the stable version (8.9.3) -
not MTA vs MTA !
--
Rick Nelson
* knghtbrd can already envision: "Subject: [INTENT TO PREPARE TO PROPOSE
FILING OF BUG REPORT] Typos in the policy document"
Reply to: