RE: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)
I said that IPSec was probably the "best" way because it's
a standard protocol, with companies such as Microsoft and
Cisco supporting it and it's supposed to be built into IPv6
if/when we ever see that.
As for how it compares, I have no idea. FreeS/WAN is the
only implementation of IPSec I've used so I won't try to
say that it's better or worse than any other implementation.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <jlgaddis@blueriver.net>
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzmeyer@netaktiv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:17 AM
To: Jeremy Gaddis
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:25:24AM -0500,
Jeremy Gaddis <jlgaddis@blueriver.net> wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
> Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it.
Why? (This is a real question: I see *many* solutions but I wonder why
I would choose one above the others.)
> FreeS/WAN (http://www.freeswan.org) is a Linux implementation
> of IPSec, but it's not the easiest thing in the world to
How do you compare it to other IPsec implementations such as pipsecd?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: