[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mail sorting tool

i had this exact same problem and couldnt find a solution that worked unfortunately. however while browsing freshmeat.net the other day i say a programme called getmail that apparently does it very well. 

worth checking out i suspect

At 14:41 3/01/2001 +0100, Martin Man wrote:

Hi gurus,
        which tool would you suggest me to use for simple mail sorting for my
small company. Let's say we're getting email for our domain via POP from one POP 
account and I've to distribute appropriate email messages to
appropriate mailboxes according to To: and Cc: headers.
The procmail fails when someone sends an email to someone@mydomain.org 
and cc's it to someoneelse@mydomain.org because procmail's rule will match the
only first address and doesn't have a chance to match against cc header,
therefore someone@mydomain.org will get the email, the others won't.
So I just would like to get a simple sorting filter to which I can pass 
messages directly from .forward and which will distribute the email to correct
place.
        I'm running potato+exim+fetchmail, know it's possible using sendmail,
but don't really want to go into it, because it's too complicated.

thanx,

P.S. or if someone knows simple ruleset for procmail ??


--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Only dead fish swims with a stream"
gpg_key_fingerprint: 2CC0 4AF6 92DA 5CBF 5F09  7BCB 6202 7024 6E06 0223
home_page: http://home.zcu.cz/~mman


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-
-=|  Daniel Free                     Earthlight Communications LTD    |=-
-=|  daniel@fizz.earthlight.co.nz    ICQ#    15707938                 |=-
-=|  Cellular # 021 258 3389         HTTP://quake.earthlight.co.nz/   |=-
-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-=|=-
Reply to: