Hi, On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:48:13AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > Attached are the two packet dumps, and here's a diff between them, > with timestamps and identical stuff stripped: > > -Frame 1: 78 bytes on wire (624 bits), 78 bytes captured (624 bits) on interface 0 > +Frame 2: 78 bytes on wire (624 bits), 78 bytes captured (624 bits) on interface 0 > […] > -Ethernet II, Src: 28:d2:44:8c:05:bd, Dst: 33:33:ff:8c:05:bd > - Destination: 33:33:ff:8c:05:bd > - Address: 33:33:ff:8c:05:bd > - .... ..1. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Locally administered address (this is NOT the factory default) > - .... ...1 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Group address (multicast/broadcast) > +Ethernet II, Src: 28:d2:44:8c:05:bd, Dst: 28:d2:44:8c:05:bd > + Destination: 28:d2:44:8c:05:bd > + Address: 28:d2:44:8c:05:bd > + .... ..0. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Globally unique address (factory default) > + .... ...0 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Individual address (unicast) > > Correct me if I am wrong, but that second frame should not be sent, > right? Why would the node send a solicitation to itself? wacky guess: This laptop does not have Intel AMT (sort of aka vPro) enabled, right? If so, try turning it off. What was actually solicited? 2001:4428:29c:0:2ad2:44ff:fe8c:5bd? Link-local? Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature