Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...

To: Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com>
Cc: IPv6 List Debian <debian-ipv6@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
From: Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 03:14:42 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] C65F3241-262F-4F94-928B-7C86E24A58E6@pobox.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] F6BB41A2-9F3C-457A-A53E-D2C7121EFD3C@pobox.com>
References: <jda0il$or9$1@dough.gmane.org> <20111226180029.GF8081@think.nuvreauspam> <4EF8CD6F.7010006@debian-linux.ro> <20111226204448.GB15642@think.nuvreauspam> <[🔎] F6BB41A2-9F3C-457A-A53E-D2C7121EFD3C@pobox.com>

Thanks! everyone for the suggestions of IPv6 capable SOHO router/firewall boxes. I'll check some of them out.


Rick

On Dec 27, 2011, at 1:20 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:

(Sigh!) ;-\ Now if somebody would just manufacture and sell aninexpensive IPv6-capable SOHO router... /-; (sigh!)
H

Reply to:

References:
- address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...
  - From: Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com>