[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ipv6 DNS and ipv4 host - Tranistion problem



On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 23:54 +0200, Simon Oosthoek wrote:

> I'm working on a research project where subnetting might actually be very
> much appliccable, for example when you are using NEMO and you have several
> mobile routers (each with its own /64 or bigger subnet), and you still want
> to keep part of your entire prefix to be subnettable outside of the HA's
> realm, then you may feel a little bit cramped by a /56.

Mobility is usually done per host, thus you route the /128 over a tunnel
to somewhere else and do ND proxying. One doesn't need loads of addres
space for this. But this depends on the design of course.

> To be honest, having 4 /58 ranges available is still quite enough not to be
> very worried, but I don't feel comfortable when even before IPv6 has any
> sort of acceptance, the freedom of a wide address space is already taken
> away....

The /56 is really intended for 'the mom and pop home', they don't do
neato things like multihoming, they most likely don't have an idea what
IP is in the first place, and they shouldn't have to either ;)

Greets,
 Jeroen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: