Re: Ipv6 DNS and ipv4 host - Tranistion problem

To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Cc: debian-ipv6@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Ipv6 DNS and ipv4 host - Tranistion problem
From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 20:40:42 +0200
Message-id: <20051005184042.GH4858@country.grep.be>
In-reply-to: <1128536591.11564.44.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com>
References: <433B6DC6.7060202@dolphins.ch> <20050929140501.46537.qmail@web33110.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20050929155613.GO31069@country.grep.be> <1128011032.11966.105.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> <20050929165845.GQ31069@country.grep.be> <1128016287.11966.166.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> <20050929202525.GA4546@country.grep.be> <1128072292.11966.259.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> <20050930114336.GB5342@country.grep.be> <1128536591.11564.44.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com>

On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 08:23:11PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
[loads of crap]

Look, I've explained a few times now how in my experience, IPv6 requires
far less administration than is the case for IPv4; it's my opinion that
the RA protocol is easier to maintain, requires less time to babysit
than is the case for DHCP, and is more robust.

Obviously your experience, and thus your opinion, differs. Big deal.

I'm sick of this discussion, really. Let's agree to disagree, shall we?

-- 
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Ipv6 DNS and ipv4 host - Tranistion problem
  - From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Ipv6 DNS and ipv4 host - Tranistion problem
Next by Date: STAR SCIENTIFIC GLASS CO.
Previous by thread: Re: Ipv6 DNS and ipv4 host - Tranistion problem
Next by thread: STAR SCIENTIFIC GLASS CO.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread