Re: Improvement suggestion for 6in4 docs.
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:59:41PM -0700, elf@florence.buici.com wrote:
> I've been working to get ipv6 running on one of my machines for a
> couple of days. The freenet6 ip tunnel allocation script appears to
> have a hiccup where it sends me an address different from the one it
> *really* assigns. 6in4 appears to be a more reliable config.
>
> Yet it is difficult to reconcile the ipv6 setup page with the use of a
> 6in4 address. What I finally did was add the following to my
> interfaces file:
>
> iface eth0 inet6 static
> address 2002:ce7c:8e1c::1:1
> netmask 48
> up ip link set sit0 up
> up ip addr add 2002:ce7c:8e1c::1 dev sit0
> up ip route add 2000::0/3 via ::131.107.152.32
> down ip link set sit0 down
Asking the list in general, is this the right way to set this up?
I'm going to be updating my IPv6 pages and would like to get it
right.
A dumb question, is 6in4 different to 6to4?
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer
csmall at : enc.com.au ieee.org debian.org
Reply to: