Re: Mass ipv6 lookups
Previously Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Well, IPv6 deployment effectively still being experimental, isn't that
> acceptable for sarge?
Depends on how you define `effectively experimental'. A fair number
of people are using it these days for real things. I receive mail
via IPv6 for example and use IPv6 to log into my home systems (and
hopefully soon work systems as well).
> Or, alternatively, three modules, dns, dns4, and dns6. dns can continue
> to work as it always has.
That sounds like a better approach.
> No idea. I guess if you reverse lookup an IPv6 address w/o dns6 it just
> fails.
It also means it is impossible to get both IPv6 and IPv4 lookups or you
have to do two lookups instead of one lookup for any record.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.wiggy.net/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: