Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence
¡Hola!
> > I've sent to the ipngwg and ngtrans mailing lists the following, based
> > on the discussions we've had here some months ago. Please if you have
> > any comments participate on the discussions in the lists mentioned
> > before.
> > The objective is allowing Linux to be RFC compliant and we being able
> > to work independently of the AF at the same.
> Have you had any interesting responses? Having written some code i now
> see the problems you are referring to and so would be interested to see
> this issue fixed.
Yes, look in the ipngwg archives for the discussion (and if you can
participate (sp?) it will be better)
> - Craig
HoraPe
---
Horacio J. Peña
horape@compendium.com.ar
horape@uninet.edu
bofh@puntoar.net.ar
horape@hcdn.gov.ar
Reply to: