Re: Debian IPv6 packages
On/Dnia Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:04:17PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote/napisał(a)
> Why not? That seems to lead to the nicest implementation, and makes alot
> of sense.
So we have problem with ,,nice'' definition ;-) But maybe you have right.
Now the problem is that USAGI stuff isn't merged with main kernel source.
Just make USAGI people to merge it... Right now they are doing kind of
,,another'' kernel && glibc as this is in *BSD family ;(
> > IMO only AI_ADDRCONFIG flag is better resolution (AI_ADDRCONFIG|AI_PASSIVE).
> > We get more flexible getaddrinfo().
>
> But that doesn't actually fix the problem. AI_ADDRCONFIG|AI_PASSIVE still
> has to return either v6, v4 or both depending on what kernel it is for
> proper operation.
Right.
> Arguably though AI_ADDRCONFIG|AI_PASSIVE should have the behavior I am
> describing..
I agree.
> Jason
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, AM2-6BONE [ PLD GNU/Linux IPv6 ]
http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ipv6/ [ enabled ]
Reply to: