>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org> writes:
Jason> On 4 Mar 2001, Brian May wrote:
>> So you think we should support IPv6 without the USAGI stuff,
>> even if it means hacking servers to ignore the error code
>> generated by bind?
Jason> It would be nice if glibc did not return both v6 and v4
Jason> sockets when you request a bind list on kernels that did
Jason> not need that. IMHO that is the best solution.
Agreed. Ideally glibc should be able to insulate applications from
changes to the kernel.
Anyone willing to fix this and/or file a bug report?
I assume (hope!) that it is possible?
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>