Re: routing problems with 6to4 IPv6?
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> You mean Linux 'routers' in that case I assume... E.g. Cisco has no
> problems whatsoever with a ::/0 route.
Yes, Alexey hasn't played with IOS, just the Linux kernel.
> If you use radvd for stateless autoconfiguration, you'll get a ::/0
> route to the link-local address of the router issuing the RAs. I'm not
> entirely sure though whether that's correct and expected behaviour.
radvd, by definition, runs on a router. The clients (or whatever
they're called) are not routers. So it doesn't help here.
The main problem is Alexey says routers should have "real routes" and
he doesn't consider ::/0 to be "real".
- Craig
>
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: