Re: Removal of IBus Cangjie from Debian
- To: bochecha@daitauha.fr
- Cc: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>, yp@anthonywong.net, ChangZhuo Chen <czchen@debian.org>, Debian Input Method <debian-input-method@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Removal of IBus Cangjie from Debian
- From: Boyuan Yang <073plan@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 18:42:06 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] CA+ya19JVqU7BQc_yc1LRH9bgz=rn6p4BFwjT-P94q-xsrWoO1Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <d2ac8d543116d700efdef3d583dab31751b00dd1.camel@daitauha.fr>
- References: <67244ff2d4eebadcd7583990c1ca01ca2dbd24ea.camel@daitauha.fr> <CAC=0FnHW8MrPVEcPF_vVxeRZjRgAU4zZb2dxSjMiKapBi1D1SA@mail.gmail.com> <20180601140952.GA7064@gmail.com> <de8c8a07382628084da59886b62edef70056f564.camel@daitauha.fr> <CAC=0FnFr3C1=iy6Wu3ObGnE+V0x4y27fb+1393o44+rOiw+udQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180603131037.GA17277@gmail.com> <d3404bb25eab18fb70cbb0c1bc643c52e18e27cc.camel@daitauha.fr> <CAC=0FnHEKz2HUG5FO8S40j7R+XjV+GAq0F4t=BDPp7ygkYiZqA@mail.gmail.com> <fd10603003b65431d9c2bb4adb601896d811661b.camel@daitauha.fr> <20180707122810.GA24455@goofy.osamu.debian.net> <d2ac8d543116d700efdef3d583dab31751b00dd1.camel@daitauha.fr>
Hi,
Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@daitauha.fr> 于2018年8月12日周日 下午1:39写道：
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 21:28 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 01:46:52PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The 3 packages have now been removed from Buster. :(
> > >
> > > Is there any way to put them back there, or will Hong Kong GNOME
> > > users
> > > not be able to type their mother tongue on Buster?
> >
> > I am slowly worrking on migrating old alioth to salsa.
>
> Did you manage to get ibus-cangjie and the others migrated to Salsa,
> and back into testing?
I dealt with ibus-cangjie several days ago. The eventual plan is to
migrate all packages
listed in https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-ime-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org
before Buster freeze.
If you find any of those packages in priority, feel free to let me know.
--
Thanks,
Boyuan
Reply to: