[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#667449: marked as done ([fcitx-sunpinyin] fcitx-sunpinyin should depends on fcitx)



Your message dated Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:17:11 +0000
with message-id <E1SFNH5-00063Y-4O at franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#667449: fixed in fcitx-sunpinyin 0.3.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #667449,
regarding [fcitx-sunpinyin] fcitx-sunpinyin should depends on fcitx
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
667449: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667449
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Liang Guo <bluestonechina@gmail.com>
Subject: [fcitx-sunpinyin] fcitx-sunpinyin should depends on fcitx
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:05:51 +0800
Size: 4366
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ime-devel/attachments/20120404/55eb4c3d/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com>
Subject: Bug#667449: fixed in fcitx-sunpinyin 0.3.4-2
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:17:11 +0000
Size: 5143
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ime-devel/attachments/20120404/55eb4c3d/attachment-0001.mht>


Reply to: