Re: The (uncalled for) toolchain maintainers roll call for stretch
On 09/10/2016 12:48 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Uncovered by the upstream primary and secondary platforms are the mips*
> architectures and powerpc. For the uncovered archs I would expect somehow more
> and pro-active Debian maintenance, however I fail to see this happen.
> - see the history of ftbfs on the buildd page of the gcc-snapshot package
> - see the status of the gcc-6 package for the pre-release uploads
> - see the number of RC issues for binutils which came up with 2.27,
> some still open.
> - Toolchain packages are not watched by porters, and I can't track
> every regression myself, however this is not done well by porters.
> On the recent Porter's call I didn't see any toolchain support for the powerpc
I would actually be happy to take over the powerpc port as its official porter.
I'm already taking care of powerpcspe, so I think it would be a perfect fit.
Let me know what needs to be done to make this happen! I don't want to see
powerpc go too soon.
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - email@example.com
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - firstname.lastname@example.org
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913