Well, -O1 still does optimize things here and there... you could check with -O0, but... yes, hardly anyone cares about debian-ia64 anymore :-/ I do wonder about SuSE, though. Surely if it's something compiler and optimization specific, they'd have hit it by now too (no idea what kernel/compiler version they're at nowadays). Lennert On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:32:55AM +0200, Émeric MASCHINO wrote: > Hi, > > Probably message for posterity as nobody cares ia64 anymore, but gcc > optimization isn't the cause of this, as alluded to earlier. While it > seems to sometimes fix the problem, I'm now having various > -O1-compiled kernels on Gentoo. Some exhibit the GDB issue, others > don't. > > Émeric > > 2014-01-19 20:55 GMT+01:00 Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 08:40:27PM +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote: > >> > >> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2013/05/msg00065.html <=== > >> BTW, why is it archived on debian-68k? > > > > Because it was send to debian-ports@lists and not > > debian-ia64@lists like this, and debian-ports goes > > to all the porter lists including m68k and ia64. > > > > > > Kurt > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ia64-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > Archive: [🔎] CAA9xbM6AwAq27Cb4jiLNn_=t1OV-oHkUw8Cs4vn5S1N4m1FxpQ@mail.gmail.com">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] CAA9xbM6AwAq27Cb4jiLNn_=t1OV-oHkUw8Cs4vn5S1N4m1FxpQ@mail.gmail.com >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature