RE: caveat: GNOME 2.6 severly broken on Debian/unstable?
Please try the current Linux binutils at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/
It should be fixed a while ago.
H.J. Lu
Intel Corporation
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Mosberger [mailto:davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com]
>Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:36 AM
>To: Ian Wienand
>Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com; debian-ia64@lists.debian.org; Lu, Hongjiu
>Subject: Re: caveat: GNOME 2.6 severly broken on Debian/unstable?
>
>>>>>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:48:40 +1000, Ian Wienand
><ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au> said:
>
> Ian> Basically the two things that were added were
>
> Ian> LDFLAGS += -Wl,-z,defs
> Ian> LDFLAGS += -Wl,-O1
>
> Ian> Which raises the question are these flags sufficiently tested
> Ian> by the binutils test suite?
>
>I don't even know what these are supposed to do. HJ seems to be
>out-of-town until later this month, so it may be some time before he
>can chime in.
>
>In the meantime: it appears that the bad libpango has hit "testing"?
>That seems very unfortunate. The only good news is that upgrading
>to libpango from "unstable" got my Debian/testing system to work again.
>
>In any case, thanks for all the good work, Ian!
>
> --david
Reply to: