[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SIGILL in __libc_csu_fini



On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:41:20AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:33:26AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > I'm having some trouble with ghc6 on ia64 (this is not using the
> > packages, which also give SIGILL, but trying to crossport from x86
> > again.
> 
> What versions of things are you using?  I just installed both ghc6 and
> ghc-cvs packages on an I2, and apart from creating a 8MB executable
> file from my simple 10 line example both work fine.
> 
> libc6.1         2.3.2.ds1-11     GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data
> ghc-cvs         20031220-3       GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilation system
> ghc6            6.2-3            GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilation system
> gcc             3.3.3-2          The GNU C compiler
> 
Hmm, the same ones as you, of those you list. ghc6 should have beaten
ghc-cvs to /usr/bin/ghc.

unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ dpkg -l libc6.1 ghc-cvs ghc6 gcc 
[...]
ii  libc6.1        2.3.2.ds1-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
pn  ghc-cvs        <none>         (no description available)
ii  ghc6           6.2-3          GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilation system
ii  gcc            3.3.3-2        The GNU C compiler
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ ghc
Illegal instruction
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ ghc6
Illegal instruction
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ which ghc
/usr/bin/ghc
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ dpkg -S usr/bin/ghc
ghc6: /usr/bin/ghc6
ghc6: /usr/bin/ghci6
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ 

I've put the complete dpkg -l output at
http://merulo.debian.org/~igloo/dpkg-l

> (might want to leave glibc list off, they have enough to worry about
> until we can prove it's a glibc bug)

Rightyho.


Thanks
Ian



Reply to: