[-glibc bcc'ed for their information]
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 04:55:20PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I think it's incredibly important this bug get fixed.
Uh, Willy:
] Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 01:41:03 +0200
] Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
] Subject: Re: Bug#204654: glibc 2.3.2-2 breaks apache on ia64
]
] Maybe it would be more helpful if you downgraded your libc6 package
] to the latest version known to work, compiled the nonstripped Apache
] binary, then upgraded again? I think you should be able to get a
] useful backtrace then.
You haven't responded, nor has anyone else, and the bug's sat idle for
over two weeks.
> It's an ABI change that gets fixed by a recompile!
Voila, it's fixed, so we don't have to worry about it. I'd like it
properly diagnosed and fixed too, but it's not RC if we can work around
all the know cases by adding a single entry to the Conflicts: line.
> I wish the glibc maintainers were giving this higher priority.
Narrow the problem down to something small and reproducible and I'm sure
they will.
Please only Cc the bug report or the glibc folks if and when you have
some useful information to add to the bug, not opinions on how important
this problem is.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Is this some kind of psych test?
Am I getting paid for this?''
Attachment:
pgp5yT0rGIt6T.pgp
Description: PGP signature