[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Unknown HZ Value



Hi,

I'm having a little trouble with my procfs, every time I use it I get a
message like this:

Unknown HZ value! (1501) Assume 1024.

I know that it has something to do with the uptime and the number of
processes in /proc/stat and that a reboot solves the problem. But I'm
running this machine (HP I2000) as server for our workgroup and don't
want to reboot it every time this message appears. Here are the outputs
of my /proc/uptime and /proc/stat.

cat /proc/uptime 
4498298.51 2421130.69

cat /proc/stat   
cpu  734020107 3298722770 273894769 9200871982
cpu0 297585498 1689429483 148746558 2470509627
cpu1 436434609 1609293287 125148211 2435395059
page 175988273 1889414709
swap 90599 101791
intr 2581355521 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 660530 3194742 8944583 0 13861760 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 7 3963 0
24245376 1812799893 98754244 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 618641485 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 248929 0
disk_io: (8,0):(10685026,1167167,36089812,9517859,613472439)
(8,1):(914859,658287,63365290,256572,8463320)
(8,2):(169454,75418,6963326,94036,16052659)
(8,3):(92037148,4993413,172323868,87043735,3060492640)
(11,0):(177,177,19980,0,0) 
ctxt 1338576131
btime 1044955006
processes 1019931

Any suggestions how to handle this problem?
Thanks

Gregor

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
 Gregor Stößer     email: gregor.stoesser@chemie.uni-karlsruhe.de
 Institut für Anorganische Chemie
 Universität Karlsruhe                          Tel: 0721/608 2988
                                                Fax: 0721/608 4854
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-



Reply to: