Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec
Greetings!
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
> Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com> writes:
>
> > Greetings!
> >
> > Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
> >
> >> > Was there ever a GNU emacs obstacle on ia64 linux, or am I confusing
> >> > the situation with xemacs?
> >>
> >> Since GNU Emacs does not assign function pointers at runtime there was
> >> never such a problem.
> >>
> >
> > Could you please sketch how this is accomplished in emacs, given its
> > lisp base?
> [...]
> > Or are all lisp function objects statically defined in C source files as
> > explicitly initialized structures?
>
> Yes.
>
These three very helpful little letters have given me the idea which I
hope will be a stable once and for all solution to this problem and
any future others like it. Far better than trying to probe ld.so's
function descriptor table, I should rather ammend the lisp compiler to
write a static function structure into each produced C source file
before compilation, with the structure's pointer element statically
initialized to the static function in the same file. I then use the
address for this structure at runtime in setting the lisp symbol's
function definition. This should work, right?
Take care,
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
> SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
> Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
Reply to: