Re: Bug#169017: fakeroot mini-proveall
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:06:50 -0500, Clint Adams <email@example.com> said:
>> Yes, the second invocation is the correct behavior. The first
>> (preloading libfakeroot) dies with a segmentation fault.
Clint> Seems that the signal handling on ia64 changes under fakeroot
Clint> in a way that doesn't happen on other architectures.
Can you be more specific as to what goes wrong? Unless fakeroot does
something very strange, there should be no visible difference in how
signal handling works on ia64 linux. But a bug is always a
possibility. The most recent bug fix in the signal-area was a fix for
sigaltstack(). I don't suppose fakeroot is using that?