Hello,
first of all, we use the BTS status, to show a translation is in BTS
state,
Am Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 08:17:15AM +0200 schrieb Camaleón:
> El 2024-06-30 a las 22:53 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió:
> > Am 30. Juni 2024 17:36:32 MESZ schrieb "Camaleón" <noelamac@gmail.com>:
> > >El 2024-06-30 a las 11:33 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió:
> > And that in turn means, that your translation did not reached unstable, so
> > the status page cannot "show it as fully translated", as you say above.
> > (Those status show, what is currently in unstable !)
> >
> > For this issue Helge already stated about some maintainers acting not
> > optimal regarding translation update reports ...
> > Sadly!
>
> Time is scarce, I do understand, but having a bug report with patch
> available opened for... 2 years? looks a bit overhelming :-)
Yes this occurs. It's quite frustrating. Some non debconf translations
are sitting in the BTS even longer without a single reply by the
maintainer.
You know bubuilles metrics?
https://i18n.debian.org/nmu-radar/nmu_bypackage.html
I just wonder - couldn't those translations be a job for Debian
janitor? I've no idea what or who powers this, but from the outside it
looks like a perfect fit.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature