[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal to change l10n system (WAS: DDTSS is down)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-01-27 12:31, Eric Spreen wrote:
> However, I strongly feel that there are several problems with the system
> that is currently being used. For example, DDTSS going down big time
> every now and then, a very steep learning curve for new translators and
> a very wide range of different systems in use (like submitting to BTS,
> DDTSS, Pootle, regular SVN/GIT commits, etc). This all adds up to the
> translation project being harder than it should be.
> 
> Therefore, I would like to propose to create a centralized system for
> all translation projects that takes away the pain of all the backend
> submission systems.
> 
> I would like to hear your thoughts on this.

I think you are on the path to something here but bundling all together
in ONE system is not going to help very much. Not as a start. It's a
project too large and to hard to get anything done.

Identify the major problems and deal with them and try to make similar
workflows and easy to grasp workflows (being different from one another
is all right).

With regards to DDTSS/DDTP I think there must be something done in the
foreseeable future. As far as I can tell there are unacceptable
maintenance tasks that rely on some individuals. And adding that the
system in some cases breaks so bad that some translation efforts are
lost (or did I get that impression wrong?) is devastating for the moral
of translators.
I haven't really worked with this (partly because when I did read some
of the documents it was a too steep learning curve. Might have been
solved since it was years ago) but doing work here is something I have
seen as a must. If I just had the time to volunteer... but with help?

- -- 
brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNQWYMAAoJEJbdSEaj0jV7x7kH/iRbsdyAxaB/cZvELWYr3CzQ
y1KPJfflKR58SJgqSkZQv1xoslGm/wqUvTRpR1fr8pvz2U1Yi0fisc6QcGtiUxSi
1cSij2hFeawp7z/NOAita2mHFCvc+TPRpdclE7tJLwiUEXuRIriYQ6NduIkr6xUj
bsy8E9LBSazy9W3sMDQryfRTy11mP/fVMD875jM0FASnEsB/ozKtMjVoclYfnF9e
T6dxKyaPjpBfJIFdw0DaaCCNUnvJFDB5tqEkBYIPk3bWOToqB06AcLy/5T9JA+l9
rVrWlk+4/kgCoKuWLsq/5WzvMEtSdRRhoriVIzcdaeFkuQY8C1sh6rfGQQkHswY=
=CFgz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: