Re: naming scheme, pt-br versus pt_BR in DDP
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06-04-2010 19:10, Simon Paillard wrote:
> In the process of moving www.d.o to another host, many inconsistencies
> pop-up.
>
> The last one being:
> * links to pt_BR from the website (for example
> http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#devref)
> * the source and built files have been renamed from pt_BR to pt-br in
> DDP by some translators
> * the website doesn't clean regularly such files
>
> => we end with this links that point to an outdated pt_BR file while the up
> to date one is pt-br.
>
> Can we agree on a common scheme like the locale name, here pt_BR ?
>
> pt_BR: used by release-notes, d-i, debian-faq, refcard
> pt-br: used by apt-howto, maint-guide, quick-ref, securing-howto
- From pt_BR l10n team it is fine either way. I do
prefer the full locale, but as Christian mentioned,
some places may not accept the underline (like
packages names). For the rest, if we can convert
(like apt-howto, maint-guide, quick-ref,
securing-howto), I am all for the common scheme. :)
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAku8v64ACgkQCjAO0JDlykYghQCgqA4o5vHkZRnbon6SyIGE6LI1
g0YAoMq86zaCENCcOQyjguV6pynl7Z6y
=86vV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: