[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to NMU ganglia to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs



Quoting Stu Teasdale (stu@drogna.org.uk):
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 07:09:43PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Dear Debian maintainer,
> > 
> > The ganglia Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
> > pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
> > for po-debconf, namely bug number 538741 (and maybe other similar bugs).
> 
> I'm vaguely active again, though I seem to have managed to mis thi bug coming in.
> I'm happy to prepare this upload.

Thanks for your answer, Stu.

Indeed, #538741 is still opened, but I confirm that the Czech
translation it contained is already in the package. Actually,
3.1.2-2.1 fixed the Czech translation but there were indeed two bug
reports with a Czech translation: #538741 and #539614.

The latter was closed with that upload but the former remained
opened....which explains why the package beeped on my radar (the
radard makes a weird calculation involving the age of l10n bugs and
the number of strings in files....so old opened bugs always make the
package appear high in the radar list: details on
http://i18n.debian.net/debian-l10n/l10n-nmu/nmu_bypackage.html.

Anyway, since then, an Italian translation popped up: #556105.

So, what I propose, Stu is that I use this opportunity to issue a
"last" call for translations which a 7-days delay....then send you a
summary and leave it up to you to do an upload (you'll get a patch wrt
the former version of the package).

In case, you have too few time and/or interest for this, I can still
upload, of course.

Would that be OK for you? 

PS: I'm 12-hours away from a 24h flight trip to another part of the
planet so you might expect some delay in my answers, unless I get your
answer very quickly (but, as you're in UK, from your mail address, I
may imagine a Sunday morning answer...). No harm, of course, there's
no hurry at all.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: