Quoting Michal ??iha?? (nijel@debian.org): > Dear Debian I18N people, > > I would like to know if some of you would be interested in translating > rpm. > > Please send the updated file to me, or submit it as a wishlist bug > against rpm. > > The package will be uploaded to unstable immediately due to severity of bug it > fixes, but I will incorporate translations ASAP. > > If you have read so far, please find the POT file in attachment. Thanks, Michal, for taking care to call for translations. That's appreciated. Still, I have a few comments: - this debconf template is likely to be considered debconf abuse ("debconf notes are Evil"...:-)) - nevertheless, the English version should be reviewed by debian-l10n-english. I can at least spot "with new version" which is IMHO missing an article What I suggest: - Discuss the real need for a debconf note. You maybe take care to display that one in very specific occasions, trying to not interrupt the installation for no reason - If the note is kept, then have it reviewed in debian-l10n-english before calling for translations. If you want, this can be coordinated by someone from debian-l10n-english (me or someone elese)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature