[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Recommended usage for podebconf-report-po



Hello,

You seem to have forgotten the attachment.

Best Regards,
Ricardo Silva

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Nicolas François
<nicolas.francois@centraliens.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> podebconf-report-po is more and more advertised and used, which are both
> good things.
>
> There has been recently a few threads about a recommended usage for
> podebconf-report-po, so I plan to add an EXAMPLES section in its manpage.
>
> Here is the current version that you can review (a formatted version, to
> be used with less -R, is attached):
>
> EXAMPLES
>       debconf templates
>           podebconf-report-po --call --languageteam --with-translators \
>                               --deadline='LC_ALL=C date -R -d '+10days''
>
>           This must be called from the package root directory (or from the
>           debian, or from the debian/po directories)
>
>       program translations
>           podebconf-report-po --call --languageteam --with-translators \
>                               --notdebconf \
>                               --deadline='LC_ALL=C date -R -d '+10days''
>
>           This must be called from the parent of the po/ directory (or from
>           the po directory itself)
>
>       In both cases, this will send a call for new translations to the
>       <debian-i18n@lists.debian.org> mailing list and will ask translation
>       updates to the previous translators. The language teams will also be
>       notified and should be able to react if the assigned translator is
>       known to be MIA.
>
>       You should then receive translations within 10 days and should make a
>       new release at that time.
>
> Best Regards,
> --
> Nekral
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>


Reply to: