[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

debconf PO translations for the package isync



Dear Debian I18N people,

I would like to know if some of you would be interested in translating
isync.

isync already includes cs.po de.po fr.po pt.po sv.po.
So do not translate it to these languages (the translators will be
contacted separately).

language        translated     fuzzy     untranslated
-----------------------------------------------------
  de                 0                         2
  fr                 2
  cs                 0                         2
  sv                 0                         2
  pt                 0                         2

Please send the updated file to Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
who will NMU isync, or submit it as a wishlist bug against isync.
The deadline for receiving the updated translation is next thursday.

If you have read so far, please find the POT file in attachement.

Thanks in advance,

# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.
# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
# FIRST AUTHOR <EMAIL@ADDRESS>, YEAR.
#
#, fuzzy
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: nboullis@debian.org\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2006-12-05 00:29+0100\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=CHARSET\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

#. Type: note
#. Description
#: ../templates:1001
msgid "isync won't refetch messages deleted locally"
msgstr ""

#. Type: note
#. Description
#: ../templates:1001
msgid ""
"Before version 1.0, isync refetched messages that were deleted locally.  "
"Some users may rely on that bug.  Since 1.0, messages that are deleted "
"locally will be deleted remotely as well - they will not be refetched.  "
"Anyone expecting the old buggy behavior may lose data."
msgstr ""

Reply to: